Vehicle Overview
Key specifications and features at a glance
Detailed Specifications
Complete technical specifications comparison
Best comparable values are highlighted in green.
Dimensions & Weight
Physical specifications and measurements
Best comparable values are highlighted in green.
Features Comparison
Standard and optional equipment comparison
Safety
Comfort
Interior Exterior
Technology
Charging & Battery Tech
EV / Hybrid Drive Features
PHEV / EV-specific features
Diesel Utility
Pros & Cons
Strengths and weaknesses of each vehicle
Ford Ranger PHEV Stormtrak PHEV
Pros
- +Exclusive Stormtrak styling
- +Strong PHEV performance
- +High equipment level
- +Useful onboard power
- +Excellent towing capacity
Cons
- −Highest PHEV price
- −Heavy kerb weight
- −Charging needed for economy
- −Lower payload than diesel
- −Large dimensions
Mazda BT-50 SP
Pros
- +Distinctive SP styling package
- +Strong 140 kW diesel engine
- +High 450 Nm torque output
- +3500 kg braked towing
- +Five-star ANCAP rating
Cons
- −Higher price than GT
- −7.8 L/100 km combined use
- −Heavy 2176 kg kerb weight
- −Large 12.5 m turning circle
- −Styling adds cost over GT
Which one should you buy?
Best for Performance: Ford Ranger PHEV Stormtrak PHEV
System power around 207 kW supports a solid performance score. Combined system power is prioritised for plug-in hybrid scoring.
Best for Value: Mazda BT-50 SP
Boot space relative to list price contributes positively to the value score.
Best Overall: Ford Ranger PHEV Stormtrak PHEV
Across performance, value, efficiency, and practicality, this variant shows a balanced overall profile.
Our Recommendation
Choose Ford Ranger PHEV Stormtrak PHEV if: You prioritise performance and responsive power.
Choose Mazda BT-50 SP if: Value for money and practical everyday use matter most.
Bottom Line: Ford Ranger PHEV Stormtrak PHEV leads on performance and Mazda BT-50 SP leads on value.
Ready to Find Your Perfect Vehicle?
Browse thousands of listings or compare more vehicles to make the best decision