Vehicle Overview
Key specifications and features at a glance
Detailed Specifications
Complete technical specifications comparison
Best comparable values are highlighted in green.
Dimensions & Weight
Physical specifications and measurements
Best comparable values are highlighted in green.
Features Comparison
Standard and optional equipment comparison
Safety
Comfort
Interior Exterior
Technology
Diesel Utility
Pros & Cons
Strengths and weaknesses of each vehicle
Ford Everest Sport
Pros
- +Sporty black styling
- +Seven-seat practicality
- +Strong 3500kg towing
- +12-inch touchscreen standard
- +Five-star ANCAP rating
Cons
- −V6 version costs more
- −20-inch ride can feel firmer
- −Less torque than V6 grades
- −Diesel running costs
- −Large SUV footprint
Mazda CX-80 G40e GT
Pros
- +Smooth inline-six petrol
- +Premium GT equipment
- +Spacious seven-seat cabin
- +Flexible cargo capacity
- +Strong safety rating
Cons
- −Highest fuel consumption
- −Large wheels firm ride
- −Complex powertrain range
- −Large SUV footprint
- −Higher servicing costs
Which one should you buy?
Best for Performance: Mazda CX-80 G40e GT
Leads this comparison on best for performance with a score of 58.
Best for Value: Mazda CX-80 G40e GT
Boot space relative to list price contributes positively to the value score.
Best for Practicality / Space: Ford Everest Sport
Boot and practicality-related dimensions score well for everyday use.
Best Overall: Mazda CX-80 G40e GT
Leads this comparison on best overall with a score of 55.
Our Recommendation
Choose Ford Everest Sport if: Value for money and practical everyday use matter most.
Choose Mazda CX-80 G40e GT if: Value for money and practical everyday use matter most.
Bottom Line: Mazda CX-80 G40e GT leads on performance, Mazda CX-80 G40e GT leads on value and Ford Everest Sport leads on practicality.
Ready to Find Your Perfect Vehicle?
Browse thousands of listings or compare more vehicles to make the best decision