Vehicle Overview
Key specifications and features at a glance
Detailed Specifications
Complete technical specifications comparison
Best comparable values are highlighted in green.
Dimensions & Weight
Physical specifications and measurements
Best comparable values are highlighted in green.
Features Comparison
Standard and optional equipment comparison
Safety
Comfort
Interior Exterior
Technology
Diesel Utility
Pros & Cons
Strengths and weaknesses of each vehicle
Ford Everest Active
Pros
- +Lowest Everest entry price
- +Seven-seat family practicality
- +Strong 3500kg towing
- +12-inch touchscreen standard
- +Five-star ANCAP rating
Cons
- −Less torque than V6 grades
- −Basic grade equipment
- −Large SUV footprint
- −Diesel running costs
- −V6 costs extra
Mazda CX-80 G40e Pure
Pros
- +Smooth inline-six petrol
- +Good seven-seat value
- +Spacious seven-seat cabin
- +Flexible cargo capacity
- +Strong safety rating
Cons
- −Highest fuel consumption
- −Basic equipment level
- −Complex powertrain range
- −Large SUV footprint
- −Higher servicing costs
Which one should you buy?
Best for Performance: Mazda CX-80 G40e Pure
Leads this comparison on best for performance with a score of 58.
Best for Value: Mazda CX-80 G40e Pure
Boot space relative to list price contributes positively to the value score.
Best for Practicality / Space: Ford Everest Active
Boot and practicality-related dimensions score well for everyday use.
Best Overall: Mazda CX-80 G40e Pure
Leads this comparison on best overall with a score of 56.
Our Recommendation
Choose Ford Everest Active if: Value for money and practical everyday use matter most.
Choose Mazda CX-80 G40e Pure if: Value for money and practical everyday use matter most.
Bottom Line: Mazda CX-80 G40e Pure leads on performance, Mazda CX-80 G40e Pure leads on value and Ford Everest Active leads on practicality.
Ready to Find Your Perfect Vehicle?
Browse thousands of listings or compare more vehicles to make the best decision