Vehicle Overview
Key specifications and features at a glance
Detailed Specifications
Complete technical specifications comparison
Best comparable values are highlighted in green.
Dimensions & Weight
Physical specifications and measurements
Best comparable values are highlighted in green.
Features Comparison
Standard and optional equipment comparison
Safety
Comfort
Interior Exterior
Technology
Charging & Battery Tech
EV / Hybrid Drive Features
Electric vehicle features
Pros & Cons
Strengths and weaknesses of each vehicle
Mazda Mazda 6e Atenza
Pros
- +Premium leather and suede trim
- +560 km WLTP range
- +194 kW DC fast charging
- +Strong 190 kW rear-drive output
- +Nine-airbag safety package
Cons
- −Costs more than GT
- −No all-wheel-drive option
- −Same range as GT
- −336 L boot is modest
- −Large 4921 mm length
Subaru WRX Sportswagon
Pros
- +Large and flexible cargo area
- +Strong turbocharged performance
- +Confident all-wheel-drive grip
- +Comfortable long-distance cabin
- +Hands-free powered tailgate
Cons
- −Higher fuel use in urban driving
- −CVT lacks manual involvement
- −Firm ride on rough roads
- −No current ANCAP rating
- −Premium unleaded fuel required
Which one should you buy?
Best for Value: Mazda Mazda 6e Atenza
Boot space relative to list price contributes positively to the value score.
Best for Practicality / Space: Subaru WRX Sportswagon
Boot and practicality-related dimensions score well for everyday use.
Best Overall: Mazda Mazda 6e Atenza
Across performance, value, efficiency, and practicality, this variant shows a balanced overall profile.
Our Recommendation
Choose Mazda Mazda 6e Atenza if: Value for money and practical everyday use matter most.
Choose Subaru WRX Sportswagon if: Value for money and practical everyday use matter most.
Bottom Line: Mazda Mazda 6e Atenza leads on value and Subaru WRX Sportswagon leads on practicality.
Ready to Find Your Perfect Vehicle?
Browse thousands of listings or compare more vehicles to make the best decision