Vehicle Overview
Key specifications and features at a glance
Detailed Specifications
Complete technical specifications comparison
Best comparable values are highlighted in green.
Dimensions & Weight
Physical specifications and measurements
Best comparable values are highlighted in green.
Features Comparison
Standard and optional equipment comparison
Safety
Comfort
Interior Exterior
Technology
Charging & Battery Tech
EV / Hybrid Drive Features
Electric vehicle features
Pros & Cons
Strengths and weaknesses of each vehicle
Mazda CX-90 G50e Azami
Pros
- +Powerful 254kW petrol
- +Top-grade luxury cabin
- +Spacious seven-seat cabin
- +Strong safety rating
- +Premium rear-drive platform
Cons
- −Higher fuel consumption
- −Highest purchase price
- −Large urban footprint
- −Third row best for children
- −Higher servicing costs
Mercedes-Benz EQB 250
Pros
- +Flexible seven-seat cabin
- +Quiet electric performance
- +Practical 495-litre boot
- +Compact urban SUV footprint
- +Strong battery warranty
Cons
- −Third row suits children best
- −Shorter range than newer rivals
- −Only 100kW DC charging
- −Front-wheel drive only
- −High purchase price
Which one should you buy?
Best for Performance: Mazda CX-90 G50e Azami
System power around 254 kW supports a solid performance score.
Best for Value: Mercedes-Benz EQB 250
Boot space relative to list price contributes positively to the value score.
Best Overall: Mercedes-Benz EQB 250
Across performance, value, efficiency, and practicality, this variant shows a balanced overall profile.
Our Recommendation
Choose Mazda CX-90 G50e Azami if: Value for money and practical everyday use matter most.
Choose Mercedes-Benz EQB 250 if: Value for money and practical everyday use matter most.
Bottom Line: Mazda CX-90 G50e Azami leads on performance and Mercedes-Benz EQB 250 leads on value.
Ready to Find Your Perfect Vehicle?
Browse thousands of listings or compare more vehicles to make the best decision