Vehicle Overview
Key specifications and features at a glance
Detailed Specifications
Complete technical specifications comparison
Best comparable values are highlighted in green.
Dimensions & Weight
Physical specifications and measurements
Best comparable values are highlighted in green.
Features Comparison
Standard and optional equipment comparison
Safety
Comfort
Interior Exterior
Technology
Diesel Utility
Pros & Cons
Strengths and weaknesses of each vehicle
Mazda CX-90 D50e Azami
Pros
- +Efficient diesel touring
- +Top-grade luxury cabin
- +Spacious seven-seat cabin
- +Strong safety rating
- +Premium rear-drive platform
Cons
- −Lower towing than petrol
- −Highest purchase price
- −Large urban footprint
- −Third row best for children
- −Higher servicing costs
Volvo XC90 Plus
Pros
- +Spacious seven-seat cabin
- +Strong 183 kW B5 engine
- +Standard all-wheel drive
- +2400 kg braked towing
- +Large 680 L cargo capacity
Cons
- −Premium purchase price
- −Large urban footprint
- −Requires premium unleaded
- −Higher fuel use than XC60
- −Third row reduces luggage room
Which one should you buy?
Best for Performance: Mazda CX-90 D50e Azami
System power around 187 kW supports a solid performance score.
Best for Value: Volvo XC90 Plus
Boot space relative to list price contributes positively to the value score.
Best for Practicality / Space: Volvo XC90 Plus
Boot and practicality-related dimensions score well for everyday use.
Best Overall: Volvo XC90 Plus
Leads this comparison on best overall with a score of 57.
Our Recommendation
Choose Volvo XC90 Plus if: Value for money and practical everyday use matter most.
Bottom Line: Mazda CX-90 D50e Azami leads on performance, Volvo XC90 Plus leads on value and Volvo XC90 Plus leads on practicality.
Ready to Find Your Perfect Vehicle?
Browse thousands of listings or compare more vehicles to make the best decision