Vehicle Overview
Key specifications and features at a glance
Detailed Specifications
Complete technical specifications comparison
Best comparable values are highlighted in green.
Dimensions & Weight
Physical specifications and measurements
Best comparable values are highlighted in green.
Features Comparison
Standard and optional equipment comparison
Safety
Comfort
Interior Exterior
Technology
Pros & Cons
Strengths and weaknesses of each vehicle
Mazda CX-80 G40e Pure
Pros
- +Smooth inline-six petrol
- +Good seven-seat value
- +Spacious seven-seat cabin
- +Flexible cargo capacity
- +Strong safety rating
Cons
- −Highest fuel consumption
- −Basic equipment level
- −Complex powertrain range
- −Large SUV footprint
- −Higher servicing costs
Skoda Kodiaq Select
Pros
- +Strong 140kW turbo performance
- +Seven-seat family practicality
- +2300kg braked towing capacity
- +Standard all-wheel drive
- +Five-star ANCAP safety
Cons
- −High 9.0L/100km fuel use
- −Third-row boot space is 289L
- −Premium unleaded recommended
- −No hybrid efficiency benefit
- −Large footprint for city parking
Which one should you buy?
Best for Performance: Mazda CX-80 G40e Pure
Leads this comparison on best for performance with a score of 58.
Best for Value: Skoda Kodiaq Select
Boot space relative to list price contributes positively to the value score.
Best Overall: Mazda CX-80 G40e Pure
Leads this comparison on best overall with a score of 56.
Our Recommendation
Choose Mazda CX-80 G40e Pure if: Value for money and practical everyday use matter most.
Choose Skoda Kodiaq Select if: Value for money and practical everyday use matter most.
Bottom Line: Mazda CX-80 G40e Pure leads on performance and Skoda Kodiaq Select leads on value.
Ready to Find Your Perfect Vehicle?
Browse thousands of listings or compare more vehicles to make the best decision