Vehicle Overview
Key specifications and features at a glance
Detailed Specifications
Complete technical specifications comparison
Best comparable values are highlighted in green.
Dimensions & Weight
Physical specifications and measurements
Best comparable values are highlighted in green.
Features Comparison
Standard and optional equipment comparison
Safety
Comfort
Interior Exterior
Technology
Diesel Utility
Pros & Cons
Strengths and weaknesses of each vehicle
Mazda CX-80 G40e GT
Pros
- +Smooth inline-six petrol
- +Premium GT equipment
- +Spacious seven-seat cabin
- +Flexible cargo capacity
- +Strong safety rating
Cons
- −Highest fuel consumption
- −Large wheels firm ride
- −Complex powertrain range
- −Large SUV footprint
- −Higher servicing costs
Mitsubishi Pajero Sport GLS
Pros
- +Seven-seat practicality
- +Strong towing capacity
- +Good off-road capability
- +Proven diesel drivetrain
- +Excellent warranty support
Cons
- −Small boot with third row
- −Ride can feel firm
- −Ageing interior design
- −Diesel noise under load
- −Some safety tech missing
Which one should you buy?
Best for Performance: Mazda CX-80 G40e GT
Leads this comparison on best for performance with a score of 58.
Best for Value: Mazda CX-80 G40e GT
Boot space relative to list price contributes positively to the value score.
Best for Practicality / Space: Mazda CX-80 G40e GT
Boot and practicality-related dimensions score well for everyday use.
Best Overall: Mazda CX-80 G40e GT
Leads this comparison on best overall with a score of 55.
Our Recommendation
Choose Mazda CX-80 G40e GT if: Value for money and practical everyday use matter most.
Bottom Line: Mazda CX-80 G40e GT leads on performance, Mazda CX-80 G40e GT leads on value and Mazda CX-80 G40e GT leads on practicality.
Ready to Find Your Perfect Vehicle?
Browse thousands of listings or compare more vehicles to make the best decision