Vehicle Overview
Key specifications and features at a glance
Detailed Specifications
Complete technical specifications comparison
Best comparable values are highlighted in green.
Dimensions & Weight
Physical specifications and measurements
Best comparable values are highlighted in green.
Features Comparison
Standard and optional equipment comparison
Safety
Comfort
Interior Exterior
Technology
Diesel Utility
Pros & Cons
Strengths and weaknesses of each vehicle
Mazda CX-80 G40e Azami
Pros
- +Smooth inline-six petrol
- +Top-grade luxury cabin
- +Spacious seven-seat cabin
- +Flexible cargo capacity
- +Strong safety rating
Cons
- −Highest fuel consumption
- −Highest purchase price
- −Complex powertrain range
- −Large SUV footprint
- −Higher servicing costs
Mitsubishi Pajero Sport Exceed
Pros
- +Premium feature package
- +Seven-seat flexibility
- +Strong 430Nm torque
- +Good touring capability
- +Advanced safety equipment
Cons
- −Higher purchase price
- −Small boot in 7-seat mode
- −Older infotainment feel
- −Firm ride comfort
- −Engine feels less refined
Which one should you buy?
Best for Performance: Mazda CX-80 G40e Azami
Leads this comparison on best for performance with a score of 58.
Best for Value: Mazda CX-80 G40e Azami
Boot space relative to list price contributes positively to the value score.
Best for Practicality / Space: Mazda CX-80 G40e Azami
Boot and practicality-related dimensions score well for everyday use.
Best Overall: Mazda CX-80 G40e Azami
Leads this comparison on best overall with a score of 55.
Our Recommendation
Choose Mazda CX-80 G40e Azami if: Value for money and practical everyday use matter most.
Bottom Line: Mazda CX-80 G40e Azami leads on performance, Mazda CX-80 G40e Azami leads on value and Mazda CX-80 G40e Azami leads on practicality.
Ready to Find Your Perfect Vehicle?
Browse thousands of listings or compare more vehicles to make the best decision