Vehicle Overview
Key specifications and features at a glance
Detailed Specifications
Complete technical specifications comparison
Best comparable values are highlighted in green.
Dimensions & Weight
Physical specifications and measurements
Best comparable values are highlighted in green.
Features Comparison
Standard and optional equipment comparison
Safety
Comfort
Interior Exterior
Technology
Charging & Battery Tech
EV / Hybrid Drive Features
Electric vehicle features
Diesel Utility
Pros & Cons
Strengths and weaknesses of each vehicle
Mazda CX-6e GT
Pros
- +486 km WLTP range
- +194 kW DC fast charging
- +1500 kg braked towing
- +Large 468 L boot
- +Lower price than Azami
Cons
- −No all-wheel-drive option
- −No ANCAP rating yet
- −Heavy 2155 kg kerb weight
- −No published acceleration figure
- −Digital mirrors reserved for Azami
Which one should you buy?
Best for Value: Mazda CX-6e GT
Boot space relative to list price contributes positively to the value score.
Best for Practicality / Space: Mazda CX-6e GT
Boot and practicality-related dimensions score well for everyday use.
Best Overall: Mazda CX-6e GT
Across performance, value, efficiency, and practicality, this variant shows a balanced overall profile.
Our Recommendation
Choose Mazda CX-6e GT if: Value for money and practical everyday use matter most.
Bottom Line: Mazda CX-6e GT leads on value and Mazda CX-6e GT leads on practicality.
Ready to Find Your Perfect Vehicle?
Browse thousands of listings or compare more vehicles to make the best decision