Vehicle Overview
Key specifications and features at a glance
Detailed Specifications
Complete technical specifications comparison
Best comparable values are highlighted in green.
Dimensions & Weight
Physical specifications and measurements
Best comparable values are highlighted in green.
Features Comparison
Standard and optional equipment comparison
Safety
Comfort
Interior Exterior
Technology
Charging & Battery Tech
EV / Hybrid Drive Features
PHEV / EV-specific features
Pros & Cons
Strengths and weaknesses of each vehicle
Mazda CX-5 GT SP
Pros
- +Bose premium audio
- +360 camera standard
- +Leather seat trim
- +Adaptive LED headlights
- +Sporty black styling
Cons
- −Costs more than Touring
- −19-inch tyre cost
- −No ventilated front seats
- −Not ANCAP rated yet
- −No hybrid option
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV ES
Pros
- +Plug-in hybrid efficiency
- +AWD standard
- +55km electric range
- +Low official fuel use
- +Strong warranty cover
Cons
- −Small boot for class
- −Older cabin design
- −Limited DC charging speed
- −No spare wheel
- −Fuel use rises uncharged
Which one should you buy?
Best for Value: Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV ES
Boot space relative to list price contributes positively to the value score.
Best for Practicality / Space: Mazda CX-5 GT SP
Boot and practicality-related dimensions score well for everyday use.
Our Recommendation
Choose Mazda CX-5 GT SP if: Value for money and practical everyday use matter most.
Choose Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV ES if: Value for money and practical everyday use matter most.
Bottom Line: Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV ES leads on value and Mazda CX-5 GT SP leads on practicality.
Ready to Find Your Perfect Vehicle?
Browse thousands of listings or compare more vehicles to make the best decision