Vehicle Overview
Key specifications and features at a glance
Detailed Specifications
Complete technical specifications comparison
Best comparable values are highlighted in green.
Dimensions & Weight
Physical specifications and measurements
Best comparable values are highlighted in green.
Features Comparison
Standard and optional equipment comparison
Safety
Comfort
Interior Exterior
Technology
Pros & Cons
Strengths and weaknesses of each vehicle
Mazda CX-3 G20 Pure
Pros
- +Affordable Mazda SUV
- +Efficient petrol engine
- +Easy city parking
- +Strong safety rating
- +Quality cabin feel
Cons
- −Small 264L boot
- −Basic equipment level
- −Limited rear-seat space
- −No AWD option
- −Rear drum brakes
MG ZS Essence
Pros
- +Better feature package
- +Large 443L boot
- +Good safety rating
- +Comfortable city SUV
- +Strong value equipment
Cons
- −Higher than Excite price
- −Petrol engine is modest
- −No hybrid economy
- −No AWD option
- −Limited towing rating
Which one should you buy?
Best for Value: MG ZS Essence
Boot space relative to list price contributes positively to the value score.
Best for Practicality / Space: MG ZS Essence
Leads this comparison on best for practicality / space with a score of 57.
Our Recommendation
Choose Mazda CX-3 G20 Pure if: Value for money and practical everyday use matter most.
Choose MG ZS Essence if: Value for money and practical everyday use matter most.
Bottom Line: MG ZS Essence leads on value and MG ZS Essence leads on practicality.
Ready to Find Your Perfect Vehicle?
Browse thousands of listings or compare more vehicles to make the best decision