Vehicle Overview

Key specifications and features at a glance

Year2020 - Present
Engine1991
Power165
FuelPetrol
TransmissionDCT
Seating5
Year2022
Engine3283
Power187
FuelPetrol
TransmissionAutomatic
Seating5

Detailed Specifications

Complete technical specifications comparison

Best comparable values are highlighted in green.

SpecificationGLA 250CX-60 G25 Pure
Engine Capacity19913283
Engine CodeM260e-Skyactiv D
Cylinder ConfigurationInlineInline
Number of Cylinders46
AspirationTurbocharged
Power165187
Torque350550
Top Speed240
Drive TypeAWDAWD
Fuel Economy City5.7
Fuel Economy Highway4.6
Fuel Economy Combined7.94.9
Emission StandardEuro 6Euro 6
Tyre Size235 / 45 R20235 / 50R20
Wheel Size2020"
Number of Doors55
Seating Capacity55
Front BrakesVentilated discsVentilated disc
Rear BrakesDiscsVentilated disc
Front SuspensionMacPherson strutDouble wishbone
Rear SuspensionMulti-linkMulti-link
Steering TypeElectric power steeringElectric power steering
Number of Airbags710
Towing Capacity20002500
Turning Circle11.410.8

Dimensions & Weight

Physical specifications and measurements

Best comparable values are highlighted in green.

DimensionGLA 250CX-60 G25 Pure
Fuel Tank Capacity5158
Length44434740
Width18491890
Height15841685
Wheelbase27292870
Ground Clearance143180
Kerb Weight17242011
Boot Space425477

Features Comparison

Standard and optional equipment comparison

Safety

FeatureGLA 250CX-60 G25 Pure
Adaptive Cruise Control
Autonomous Emergency Braking
Lane Departure Warning
Lane Keep Assist
Blind Spot Monitoring
Rear Cross Traffic Alert
Traffic Sign Recognition
Driver Attention Monitor
Front Parking Sensors
Rear Parking Sensors
360 Camera
Reverse Camera
Hill Start Assist
Tyre Pressure Monitoring System
Rear Occupant Alert

Comfort

FeatureGLA 250CX-60 G25 Pure
Keyless Entry
NFC Keyless Entry
Push Button Start
Dual-Zone Climate Control
Tri-Zone Climate Control
Heated Front Seats
Ventilated Front Seats
Heated Steering Wheel
Power Tailgate
Remote Start
Power Driver Seat
Power Passenger Seat
Memory Seats
Auto Dimming Mirror
Rain Sensing Wipers
Adaptive Headlights

Interior Exterior

FeatureGLA 250CX-60 G25 Pure
Leather Seats
Fabric Seats
Ambient Lighting
Sunroof
Panoramic Roof
LED Headlights
Matrix LED Headlights
Daytime Running Lights
Alloy Wheels
Roof Rails
Rear Privacy Glass
Power Folding Mirrors

Technology

FeatureGLA 250CX-60 G25 Pure
Touchscreen Display
Digital Instrument Cluster
Apple CarPlay
Android Auto
Wireless Apple CarPlay
Wireless Android Auto
Wireless Phone Charging
Built-in Navigation
Premium Audio System
Head-Up Display
USB-C Ports
Bluetooth Connectivity
Voice Control
Connected Car App

Pros & Cons

Strengths and weaknesses of each vehicle

Mercedes-Benz GLA 250

Pros

  • +Strong 165 kW performance
  • +Standard all-wheel drive
  • +Useful 2000 kg towing
  • +Premium cabin technology
  • +Compact urban dimensions

Cons

  • High price for a small SUV
  • Firm ride on 20-inch wheels
  • Rear space is only average
  • Higher fuel use than GLA 200
  • Options can be expensive

Mazda CX-60 G25 Pure

Pros

  • +Excellent diesel efficiency
  • +Top-grade luxury cabin
  • +Premium rear-drive platform
  • +Practical 477L boot
  • +Strong safety rating

Cons

  • Diesel noise under load
  • Highest purchase price
  • Complex powertrain range
  • Large SUV footprint
  • Higher servicing costs

Which one should you buy?

Best for Performance: Mercedes-Benz GLA 250

Leads this comparison on best for performance with a score of 58.

Best for Value: Mercedes-Benz GLA 250

Boot space relative to list price contributes positively to the value score.

Best for Practicality / Space: Mercedes-Benz GLA 250

Boot and practicality-related dimensions score well for everyday use.

Our Recommendation

Choose Mercedes-Benz GLA 250 if: Value for money and practical everyday use matter most.

Bottom Line: Mercedes-Benz GLA 250 leads on performance, Mercedes-Benz GLA 250 leads on value and Mercedes-Benz GLA 250 leads on practicality.

Ready to Find Your Perfect Vehicle?

Browse thousands of listings or compare more vehicles to make the best decision