Vehicle Overview
Key specifications and features at a glance
Detailed Specifications
Complete technical specifications comparison
Best comparable values are highlighted in green.
Dimensions & Weight
Physical specifications and measurements
Best comparable values are highlighted in green.
Features Comparison
Standard and optional equipment comparison
Safety
Comfort
Interior Exterior
Technology
Pros & Cons
Strengths and weaknesses of each vehicle
Kia Sportage GT-Line
Pros
- +Premium GT-Line features
- +Turbo AWD traction
- +Stylish interior finish
- +Advanced safety systems
- +Practical 543L boot
Cons
- −Higher purchase price
- −Larger wheels firm ride
- −Premium fuel recommended
- −Not as efficient as hybrid
- −Tyres can be costly
Mazda CX-60 G40e Touring
Pros
- +Leather seat trim
- +Heated front seats
- +Power front seats
- +Driver seat memory
- +Strong towing ability
Cons
- −No Bose audio
- −No panoramic sunroof
- −No heated rear seats
- −No ventilated seats
- −Higher fuel use in petrol
Which one should you buy?
Best for Performance: Mazda CX-60 G40e Touring
Leads this comparison on best for performance with a score of 58.
Best for Value: Kia Sportage GT-Line
Boot space relative to list price contributes positively to the value score.
Best for Practicality / Space: Mazda CX-60 G40e Touring
Boot and practicality-related dimensions score well for everyday use.
Best Overall: Mazda CX-60 G40e Touring
Leads this comparison on best overall with a score of 57.
Our Recommendation
Choose Kia Sportage GT-Line if: Value for money and practical everyday use matter most.
Choose Mazda CX-60 G40e Touring if: Value for money and practical everyday use matter most.
Bottom Line: Mazda CX-60 G40e Touring leads on performance, Kia Sportage GT-Line leads on value and Mazda CX-60 G40e Touring leads on practicality.
Ready to Find Your Perfect Vehicle?
Browse thousands of listings or compare more vehicles to make the best decision