Vehicle Overview
Key specifications and features at a glance
Detailed Specifications
Complete technical specifications comparison
Best comparable values are highlighted in green.
Dimensions & Weight
Physical specifications and measurements
Best comparable values are highlighted in green.
Features Comparison
Standard and optional equipment comparison
Safety
Comfort
Interior Exterior
Technology
Charging & Battery Tech
EV / Hybrid Drive Features
PHEV / EV-specific features
Electric vehicle features
Pros & Cons
Strengths and weaknesses of each vehicle
Kia EV9 Air
Pros
- +Seven-seat electric practicality
- +Useful 443 km WLTP range
- +Ultra-fast charging
- +Large 90 L front trunk
- +Comfortable locally tuned ride
Cons
- −Only 900 kg braked towing
- −RWD only
- −Large exterior dimensions
- −High purchase price
- −333 L boot with seven seats
Mazda CX-80 P50e Azami
Pros
- +Strong PHEV performance
- +Top-grade luxury cabin
- +Spacious seven-seat cabin
- +Flexible cargo capacity
- +Strong safety rating
Cons
- −Needs regular charging
- −Highest purchase price
- −Complex powertrain range
- −Large SUV footprint
- −Higher servicing costs
Which one should you buy?
Best for Performance: Mazda CX-80 P50e Azami
System power around 241 kW supports a solid performance score. Combined system power is prioritised for plug-in hybrid scoring.
Best for Value: Mazda CX-80 P50e Azami
Boot space relative to list price contributes positively to the value score.
Best for Practicality / Space: Mazda CX-80 P50e Azami
Boot and practicality-related dimensions score well for everyday use.
Our Recommendation
Choose Kia EV9 Air if: Value for money and practical everyday use matter most.
Choose Mazda CX-80 P50e Azami if: Value for money and practical everyday use matter most.
Bottom Line: Mazda CX-80 P50e Azami leads on performance, Mazda CX-80 P50e Azami leads on value and Mazda CX-80 P50e Azami leads on practicality.
Ready to Find Your Perfect Vehicle?
Browse thousands of listings or compare more vehicles to make the best decision