Vehicle Overview
Key specifications and features at a glance
Detailed Specifications
Complete technical specifications comparison
Best comparable values are highlighted in green.
Dimensions & Weight
Physical specifications and measurements
Best comparable values are highlighted in green.
Features Comparison
Standard and optional equipment comparison
Safety
Comfort
Interior Exterior
Technology
Charging & Battery Tech
EV / Hybrid Drive Features
Electric vehicle features
Pros & Cons
Strengths and weaknesses of each vehicle
Kia EV3 GT-Line
Pros
- +Premium GT-Line equipment
- +150kW electric motor
- +V2L interior and exterior power
- +Five-star ANCAP safety
- +Practical 460L boot
Cons
- −Higher price than Air
- −Front-wheel drive only
- −No AWD option
- −DC charging below 150kW
- −Real-world range varies
Mazda CX-60 G40e Azami
Pros
- +Nappa leather trim
- +Ventilated front seats
- +Premium cabin finish
- +Top safety equipment
- +Flagship specification
Cons
- −Most expensive grade
- −Firmer 20 inch ride
- −Heavy kerb weight
- −Packages cost extra
- −PHEV boot floor packaging
Which one should you buy?
Best for Performance: Mazda CX-60 G40e Azami
Leads this comparison on best for performance with a score of 58.
Best for Value: Mazda CX-60 G40e Azami
Boot space relative to list price contributes positively to the value score.
Best for Practicality / Space: Mazda CX-60 G40e Azami
Boot and practicality-related dimensions score well for everyday use.
Our Recommendation
Choose Kia EV3 GT-Line if: Value for money and practical everyday use matter most.
Choose Mazda CX-60 G40e Azami if: Value for money and practical everyday use matter most.
Bottom Line: Mazda CX-60 G40e Azami leads on performance, Mazda CX-60 G40e Azami leads on value and Mazda CX-60 G40e Azami leads on practicality.
Ready to Find Your Perfect Vehicle?
Browse thousands of listings or compare more vehicles to make the best decision