Vehicle Overview
Key specifications and features at a glance
Detailed Specifications
Complete technical specifications comparison
Best comparable values are highlighted in green.
Dimensions & Weight
Physical specifications and measurements
Best comparable values are highlighted in green.
Features Comparison
Standard and optional equipment comparison
Safety
Comfort
Interior Exterior
Technology
Charging & Battery Tech
EV / Hybrid Drive Features
Pros & Cons
Strengths and weaknesses of each vehicle
Hyundai Santa Fe Hybrid
Pros
- +Efficient 5.6L economy
- +Spacious seven-seat cabin
- +Large 642L boot
- +No charging required
- +Strong safety technology
Cons
- −Base grade equipment
- −Hybrid costs more upfront
- −Towing lower than petrol
- −Large city footprint
- −Third row suits children
Mazda CX-80 G40e Pure
Pros
- +Smooth inline-six petrol
- +Good seven-seat value
- +Spacious seven-seat cabin
- +Flexible cargo capacity
- +Strong safety rating
Cons
- −Highest fuel consumption
- −Basic equipment level
- −Complex powertrain range
- −Large SUV footprint
- −Higher servicing costs
Which one should you buy?
Best for Performance: Mazda CX-80 G40e Pure
Leads this comparison on best for performance with a score of 58.
Best for Value: Hyundai Santa Fe Hybrid
Boot space relative to list price contributes positively to the value score.
Best for Practicality / Space: Hyundai Santa Fe Hybrid
Boot and practicality-related dimensions score well for everyday use.
Our Recommendation
Choose Hyundai Santa Fe Hybrid if: Value for money and practical everyday use matter most.
Choose Mazda CX-80 G40e Pure if: Value for money and practical everyday use matter most.
Bottom Line: Mazda CX-80 G40e Pure leads on performance, Hyundai Santa Fe Hybrid leads on value and Hyundai Santa Fe Hybrid leads on practicality.
Ready to Find Your Perfect Vehicle?
Browse thousands of listings or compare more vehicles to make the best decision