Vehicle Overview
Key specifications and features at a glance
Detailed Specifications
Complete technical specifications comparison
Best comparable values are highlighted in green.
Dimensions & Weight
Physical specifications and measurements
Best comparable values are highlighted in green.
Features Comparison
Standard and optional equipment comparison
Safety
Comfort
Interior Exterior
Technology
Charging & Battery Tech
EV / Hybrid Drive Features
Electric vehicle features
Diesel Utility
Pros & Cons
Strengths and weaknesses of each vehicle
Hyundai Ioniq 5 Dynamiq
Pros
- +Strong 168kW rear-wheel-drive performance
- +530km WLTP range
- +Ultra-fast 800V charging
- +Spacious practical cabin
- +Useful V2L power supply
Cons
- −More expensive than base IONIQ 5
- −20-inch wheels reduce range
- −Large exterior footprint
- −No spare wheel
- −Real-world range varies
Mazda CX-70 D50e Azami
Pros
- +Efficient diesel touring
- +Top-grade luxury cabin
- +Huge 589L boot
- +Strong 2500kg towing
- +Premium rear-drive platform
Cons
- −Diesel noise under load
- −Highest purchase price
- −Large urban footprint
- −Five seats only
- −Higher servicing costs
Which one should you buy?
Best for Performance: Mazda CX-70 D50e Azami
System power around 187 kW supports a solid performance score.
Best for Practicality / Space: Mazda CX-70 D50e Azami
Boot and practicality-related dimensions score well for everyday use.
Best Overall: Hyundai Ioniq 5 Dynamiq
Across performance, value, efficiency, and practicality, this variant shows a balanced overall profile.
Our Recommendation
Choose Hyundai Ioniq 5 Dynamiq if: Value for money and practical everyday use matter most.
Choose Mazda CX-70 D50e Azami if: Value for money and practical everyday use matter most.
Bottom Line: Mazda CX-70 D50e Azami leads on performance and Mazda CX-70 D50e Azami leads on practicality.
Ready to Find Your Perfect Vehicle?
Browse thousands of listings or compare more vehicles to make the best decision