Vehicle Overview
Key specifications and features at a glance
Detailed Specifications
Complete technical specifications comparison
Best comparable values are highlighted in green.
Dimensions & Weight
Physical specifications and measurements
Best comparable values are highlighted in green.
Features Comparison
Standard and optional equipment comparison
Safety
Comfort
Interior Exterior
Technology
Diesel Utility
Pros & Cons
Strengths and weaknesses of each vehicle
Ford Ranger Super Duty Super Duty
Pros
- +Massive 4500kg towing
- +Long range 130L tank
- +High 295mm clearance
- +Strong V6 diesel torque
- +Heavy-duty chassis upgrades
Cons
- −High purchase price
- −No official fuel economy
- −Large city footprint
- −Work-focused base trim
- −Tub cargo volume unpublished
Mazda BT-50 GT
Pros
- +Premium leather-appointed cabin
- +Strong 140 kW diesel engine
- +High 450 Nm torque output
- +3500 kg braked towing
- +Five-star ANCAP rating
Cons
- −Costs more than XTR
- −7.1 L/100 km combined use
- −Heavier 2102 kg kerb weight
- −Large 12.5 m turning circle
- −Diesel-only powertrain
Which one should you buy?
Best for Performance: Ford Ranger Super Duty Super Duty
System power around 154 kW supports a solid performance score.
Best for Value: Mazda BT-50 GT
Boot space relative to list price contributes positively to the value score.
Best for Practicality / Space: Mazda BT-50 GT
Boot and practicality-related dimensions score well for everyday use.
Best Overall: Ford Ranger Super Duty Super Duty
Across performance, value, efficiency, and practicality, this variant shows a balanced overall profile.
Our Recommendation
Choose Ford Ranger Super Duty Super Duty if: Space, seating, and everyday practicality come first.
Choose Mazda BT-50 GT if: Value for money and practical everyday use matter most.
Bottom Line: Ford Ranger Super Duty Super Duty leads on performance, Mazda BT-50 GT leads on value and Mazda BT-50 GT leads on practicality.
Ready to Find Your Perfect Vehicle?
Browse thousands of listings or compare more vehicles to make the best decision