Vehicle Overview
Key specifications and features at a glance
Detailed Specifications
Complete technical specifications comparison
Best comparable values are highlighted in green.
Dimensions & Weight
Physical specifications and measurements
Best comparable values are highlighted in green.
Features Comparison
Standard and optional equipment comparison
Safety
Comfort
Interior Exterior
Technology
Charging & Battery Tech
EV / Hybrid Drive Features
PHEV / EV-specific features
Electric vehicle features
Pros & Cons
Strengths and weaknesses of each vehicle
Ford Mustang Mach-E Premium
Pros
- +Long 615km WLTP range
- +Strong 212kW rear-drive performance
- +Large 88kWh usable battery
- +Premium cabin equipment
- +Large 519L cargo area
Cons
- −Higher price than Select
- −Rear-wheel drive only
- −150kW charging trails newer EVs
- −Large battery increases charge time
- −No spare wheel
Mazda CX-60 P50e Azami
Pros
- +Nappa leather trim
- +Ventilated front seats
- +Premium cabin finish
- +Top safety equipment
- +Flagship specification
Cons
- −Most expensive grade
- −Firmer 20 inch ride
- −Heavy kerb weight
- −Packages cost extra
- −PHEV boot floor packaging
Which one should you buy?
Best for Performance: Mazda CX-60 P50e Azami
System power around 241 kW supports a solid performance score. Combined system power is prioritised for plug-in hybrid scoring.
Best for Value: Mazda CX-60 P50e Azami
Boot space relative to list price contributes positively to the value score.
Best Overall: Ford Mustang Mach-E Premium
Across performance, value, efficiency, and practicality, this variant shows a balanced overall profile.
Our Recommendation
Choose Ford Mustang Mach-E Premium if: Value for money and practical everyday use matter most.
Choose Mazda CX-60 P50e Azami if: Value for money and practical everyday use matter most.
Bottom Line: Mazda CX-60 P50e Azami leads on performance and Mazda CX-60 P50e Azami leads on value.
Ready to Find Your Perfect Vehicle?
Browse thousands of listings or compare more vehicles to make the best decision