Vehicle Overview
Key specifications and features at a glance
Detailed Specifications
Complete technical specifications comparison
Best comparable values are highlighted in green.
Dimensions & Weight
Physical specifications and measurements
Best comparable values are highlighted in green.
Features Comparison
Standard and optional equipment comparison
Safety
Comfort
Interior Exterior
Technology
Charging & Battery Tech
EV / Hybrid Drive Features
Electric vehicle features
Pros & Cons
Strengths and weaknesses of each vehicle
Farizon SV LWB Low Roof
Pros
- +Useful 8.25 cubic metre cargo area
- +Strong 1235 kg payload
- +355 km WLTP electric range
- +Fast 140 kW DC charging
- +2000 kg braked towing capacity
Cons
- −Only two front airbags
- −No ANCAP star rating
- −V2L requires an optional package
- −Larger turning circle than SWB
- −Front-wheel drive only
Peugeot E-Partner Van E-Partner Pro Long Auto
Pros
- +258km WLTP electric range
- +100kW DC rapid charging
- +3.9m3 cargo capacity
- +750kg braked towing capacity
- +Quiet zero-tailpipe-emission operation
Cons
- −Higher purchase price than petrol Partner
- −Range reduces with heavy loads
- −750kg towing limit
- −Charging takes longer than refuelling
- −Long-wheelbase body needs more parking space
Which one should you buy?
Best for Practicality / Space: Farizon SV LWB Low Roof
Boot and practicality-related dimensions score well for everyday use.
Best Overall: Peugeot E-Partner Van E-Partner Pro Long Auto
Across performance, value, efficiency, and practicality, this variant shows a balanced overall profile.
Our Recommendation
Choose Farizon SV LWB Low Roof if: Value for money and practical everyday use matter most.
Choose Peugeot E-Partner Van E-Partner Pro Long Auto if: Value for money and practical everyday use matter most.
Bottom Line: Farizon SV LWB Low Roof leads on practicality.
Ready to Find Your Perfect Vehicle?
Browse thousands of listings or compare more vehicles to make the best decision