Vehicle Overview
Key specifications and features at a glance
Detailed Specifications
Complete technical specifications comparison
Best comparable values are highlighted in green.
Dimensions & Weight
Physical specifications and measurements
Best comparable values are highlighted in green.
Features Comparison
Standard and optional equipment comparison
Safety
Comfort
Interior Exterior
Technology
Charging & Battery Tech
EV / Hybrid Drive Features
PHEV / EV-specific features
Electric vehicle features
Pros & Cons
Strengths and weaknesses of each vehicle
Denza B8 6-Seat
Pros
- +Premium second-row captain chairs
- +Strong 425 kW hybrid output
- +3500 kg braked towing
- +Five-star ANCAP safety
- +Mechanical differential locks
Cons
- −Costs more than seven-seat B8
- −Carries one fewer passenger
- −Very heavy 3290 kg kerb weight
- −Small 147 L boot with all rows up
- −Large exterior dimensions
Ford Mustang Mach-E GT
Pros
- +Very strong 434 kW performance
- +High 955 Nm system torque
- +Dual-motor all-wheel drive
- +515 km WLTP range
- +MagneRide adaptive suspension
Cons
- −Highest price in the lineup
- −Heavier than RWD variants
- −Shorter range than Premium
- −GT is not ANCAP rated
- −20-inch tyres cost more
Which one should you buy?
Best for Value: Ford Mustang Mach-E GT
Boot space relative to list price contributes positively to the value score.
Best for Practicality / Space: Ford Mustang Mach-E GT
Boot and practicality-related dimensions score well for everyday use.
Best Overall: Ford Mustang Mach-E GT
Across performance, value, efficiency, and practicality, this variant shows a balanced overall profile.
Our Recommendation
Choose Denza B8 6-Seat if: You prioritise performance and responsive power.
Choose Ford Mustang Mach-E GT if: You prioritise performance and responsive power.
Bottom Line: Ford Mustang Mach-E GT leads on value and Ford Mustang Mach-E GT leads on practicality.
Ready to Find Your Perfect Vehicle?
Browse thousands of listings or compare more vehicles to make the best decision