Vehicle Overview
Key specifications and features at a glance
Detailed Specifications
Complete technical specifications comparison
Best comparable values are highlighted in green.
Dimensions & Weight
Physical specifications and measurements
Best comparable values are highlighted in green.
Features Comparison
Standard and optional equipment comparison
Safety
Comfort
Interior Exterior
Technology
Charging & Battery Tech
EV / Hybrid Drive Features
PHEV / EV-specific features
Electric vehicle features
Pros & Cons
Strengths and weaknesses of each vehicle
Cadillac OPTIQ Sport AWD
Pros
- +530 km WLTP range
- +Powerful 388 kW dual-motor AWD
- +190 kW DC fast charging
- +Large 793 L boot
- +Sport exterior treatment
Cons
- −High Australian purchase price
- −Heavy 2687 kg tare weight
- −Large footprint for city parking
- −No current ANCAP rating
- −21-inch tyres may be costly to replace
Mazda CX-60 P50e Azami
Pros
- +Nappa leather trim
- +Ventilated front seats
- +Premium cabin finish
- +Top safety equipment
- +Flagship specification
Cons
- −Most expensive grade
- −Firmer 20 inch ride
- −Heavy kerb weight
- −Packages cost extra
- −PHEV boot floor packaging
Which one should you buy?
Best for Performance: Cadillac OPTIQ Sport AWD
System power around 388 kW supports a solid performance score.
Best for Value: Mazda CX-60 P50e Azami
Boot space relative to list price contributes positively to the value score.
Best Overall: Cadillac OPTIQ Sport AWD
Across performance, value, efficiency, and practicality, this variant shows a balanced overall profile.
Our Recommendation
Choose Cadillac OPTIQ Sport AWD if: You prioritise performance and responsive power.
Choose Mazda CX-60 P50e Azami if: Value for money and practical everyday use matter most.
Bottom Line: Cadillac OPTIQ Sport AWD leads on performance and Mazda CX-60 P50e Azami leads on value.
Ready to Find Your Perfect Vehicle?
Browse thousands of listings or compare more vehicles to make the best decision