Vehicle Overview
Key specifications and features at a glance
Detailed Specifications
Complete technical specifications comparison
Best comparable values are highlighted in green.
Dimensions & Weight
Physical specifications and measurements
Best comparable values are highlighted in green.
Features Comparison
Standard and optional equipment comparison
Safety
Comfort
Interior Exterior
Technology
Charging & Battery Tech
EV / Hybrid Drive Features
Electric vehicle features
Pros & Cons
Strengths and weaknesses of each vehicle
BYD Atto 3 Standard Range
Pros
- +Lower entry price
- +Useful 345 km WLTP range
- +Spacious 440 litre boot
- +V2L power capability
- +Five-star ANCAP safety
Cons
- −Shorter range than Extended Range
- −Slower 70 kW DC charging
- −No panoramic sunroof
- −No powered tailgate
- −Front-wheel drive only
Mazda CX-5 Pure
Pros
- +Lowest CX-5 entry price
- +Standard AWD traction
- +Larger 466L boot
- +Strong safety technology
- +Runs on 91 RON petrol
Cons
- −Base-grade cabin trim
- −No wireless smartphone mirroring
- −No powered tailgate
- −Not ANCAP rated yet
- −No hybrid option
Which one should you buy?
Best for Value: BYD Atto 3 Standard Range
Boot space relative to list price contributes positively to the value score.
Best for Practicality / Space: Mazda CX-5 Pure
Boot and practicality-related dimensions score well for everyday use.
Best Overall: BYD Atto 3 Standard Range
Across performance, value, efficiency, and practicality, this variant shows a balanced overall profile.
Our Recommendation
Choose BYD Atto 3 Standard Range if: Value for money and practical everyday use matter most.
Choose Mazda CX-5 Pure if: Value for money and practical everyday use matter most.
Bottom Line: BYD Atto 3 Standard Range leads on value and Mazda CX-5 Pure leads on practicality.
Ready to Find Your Perfect Vehicle?
Browse thousands of listings or compare more vehicles to make the best decision