Vehicle Overview
Key specifications and features at a glance
Detailed Specifications
Complete technical specifications comparison
Best comparable values are highlighted in green.
Dimensions & Weight
Physical specifications and measurements
Best comparable values are highlighted in green.
Features Comparison
Standard and optional equipment comparison
Safety
Comfort
Interior Exterior
Technology
Charging & Battery Tech
EV / Hybrid Drive Features
PHEV / EV-specific features
Pros & Cons
Strengths and weaknesses of each vehicle
BMW X3 20 xDrive
Pros
- +Lowest X3 purchase price
- +Standard all-wheel drive
- +Large 570 litre boot
- +Strong 2400 kg towing capacity
- +Comfortable adaptive suspension
Cons
- −Slower than other X3 variants
- −Premium servicing costs
- −Premium fuel recommended
- −Large body for urban parking
- −Options can raise the price
Mazda CX-60 P50e Azami
Pros
- +Nappa leather trim
- +Ventilated front seats
- +Premium cabin finish
- +Top safety equipment
- +Flagship specification
Cons
- −Most expensive grade
- −Firmer 20 inch ride
- −Heavy kerb weight
- −Packages cost extra
- −PHEV boot floor packaging
Which one should you buy?
Best for Performance: Mazda CX-60 P50e Azami
System power around 241 kW supports a solid performance score. Combined system power is prioritised for plug-in hybrid scoring.
Best for Value: Mazda CX-60 P50e Azami
Boot space relative to list price contributes positively to the value score.
Best Overall: Mazda CX-60 P50e Azami
Across performance, value, efficiency, and practicality, this variant shows a balanced overall profile.
Our Recommendation
Choose BMW X3 20 xDrive if: Value for money and practical everyday use matter most.
Choose Mazda CX-60 P50e Azami if: Value for money and practical everyday use matter most.
Bottom Line: Mazda CX-60 P50e Azami leads on performance and Mazda CX-60 P50e Azami leads on value.
Ready to Find Your Perfect Vehicle?
Browse thousands of listings or compare more vehicles to make the best decision