Vehicle Overview
Key specifications and features at a glance
Detailed Specifications
Complete technical specifications comparison
Best comparable values are highlighted in green.
Dimensions & Weight
Physical specifications and measurements
Best comparable values are highlighted in green.
Features Comparison
Standard and optional equipment comparison
Safety
Comfort
Interior Exterior
Technology
Charging & Battery Tech
EV / Hybrid Drive Features
Electric vehicle features
Pros & Cons
Strengths and weaknesses of each vehicle
BMW 1 Series 118
Pros
- +Efficient three-cylinder engine
- +Practical 380 litre boot
- +Premium compact cabin
- +Strong standard technology
- +Lower entry price
Cons
- −Front-wheel drive only
- −Modest 115 kW output
- −Firm ride on larger wheels
- −Rear space is limited
- −Options increase price quickly
Mazda Mazda 6e Atenza
Pros
- +Premium leather and suede trim
- +560 km WLTP range
- +194 kW DC fast charging
- +Strong 190 kW rear-drive output
- +Nine-airbag safety package
Cons
- −Costs more than GT
- −No all-wheel-drive option
- −Same range as GT
- −336 L boot is modest
- −Large 4921 mm length
Which one should you buy?
Best for Value: Mazda Mazda 6e Atenza
Boot space relative to list price contributes positively to the value score.
Best Overall: Mazda Mazda 6e Atenza
Across performance, value, efficiency, and practicality, this variant shows a balanced overall profile.
Our Recommendation
Choose BMW 1 Series 118 if: Value for money and practical everyday use matter most.
Choose Mazda Mazda 6e Atenza if: Value for money and practical everyday use matter most.
Bottom Line: Mazda Mazda 6e Atenza leads on value.
Ready to Find Your Perfect Vehicle?
Browse thousands of listings or compare more vehicles to make the best decision