Vehicle Overview
Key specifications and features at a glance
Detailed Specifications
Complete technical specifications comparison
Best comparable values are highlighted in green.
Dimensions & Weight
Physical specifications and measurements
Best comparable values are highlighted in green.
Features Comparison
Standard and optional equipment comparison
Safety
Comfort
Interior Exterior
Technology
Charging & Battery Tech
EV / Hybrid Drive Features
PHEV / EV-specific features
Electric vehicle features
Pros & Cons
Strengths and weaknesses of each vehicle
Audi Q4 e-tron 45 e-tron
Pros
- +Long 524 km WLTP range
- +Strong 210 kW rear-drive performance
- +Fast 175 kW DC charging
- +Practical 520 litre boot
- +Five-star ANCAP safety
Cons
- −High purchase price
- −No all-wheel drive
- −Heavy 2145 kg unladen weight
- −No one-pedal driving
- −Modest 1000 kg towing capacity
Mazda CX-60 P50e Azami
Pros
- +Nappa leather trim
- +Ventilated front seats
- +Premium cabin finish
- +Top safety equipment
- +Flagship specification
Cons
- −Most expensive grade
- −Firmer 20 inch ride
- −Heavy kerb weight
- −Packages cost extra
- −PHEV boot floor packaging
Which one should you buy?
Best for Value: Mazda CX-60 P50e Azami
Boot space relative to list price contributes positively to the value score.
Best for Practicality / Space: Mazda CX-60 P50e Azami
Boot and practicality-related dimensions score well for everyday use.
Best Overall: Audi Q4 e-tron 45 e-tron
Across performance, value, efficiency, and practicality, this variant shows a balanced overall profile.
Our Recommendation
Choose Audi Q4 e-tron 45 e-tron if: Value for money and practical everyday use matter most.
Choose Mazda CX-60 P50e Azami if: Value for money and practical everyday use matter most.
Bottom Line: Mazda CX-60 P50e Azami leads on value and Mazda CX-60 P50e Azami leads on practicality.
Ready to Find Your Perfect Vehicle?
Browse thousands of listings or compare more vehicles to make the best decision